kascefo.blogg.se

Launch docker hyperkit with more cpu coures
Launch docker hyperkit with more cpu coures








  1. #Launch docker hyperkit with more cpu coures for mac#
  2. #Launch docker hyperkit with more cpu coures code#

It's already a special snowflake may as well treat it like one. (In the rare case that I do want a persistent database, I run it on the host. Why would any such data need to live longer than the containers producing+consuming it?

#Launch docker hyperkit with more cpu coures code#

Any data is just there to verify that the code is doing the right thing.

launch docker hyperkit with more cpu coures

I don't want any persistent volumes, host mounts, any of that. Caches, databases, message queues? In development, they're ephemeral. In fact, best if it gets blown away on every restart.Īny statefulness is to be avoided, because a stateful Docker host might mislead me that my images will work in prod, when they're really dependent on something in my dev VM. The less it can do other than that, the better. I want a dumb cattle VM running Container OS or an equivalent, whose only job is to run containers, ephemerally, connected to my host. I don't want to maintain my own special-snowflake VM just to run docker containers on it. Why would I want that control when Docker on Mac does everything exactly the way I would do it if I set it up myself? The common suggestion is to use NFS to get around those, which is just ridiculous when you think about it.

#Launch docker hyperkit with more cpu coures for mac#

The suggestion above is not bizzare, it's a normal use case: run Docker on Linux like it's meant to be run.ĭocker for Mac has had performance issues for years, especially related to file I/O. It shocks me that so many people want to run Docker on a platform it was never built for. It will eat RAM up to the amount you specify rather than dynamically allocating and deallocating as per the requirements of each running container like on Linux. It's also why you can limit how many CPU cores and RAM Docker can use, since you're just giving the underlying virtual machine those limits through the Docker settings app. The way it works on Intel-based Macs is through the xhyve/hyperkit hypervisor, i.e. Docker has never and will never run on a Mac natively.

launch docker hyperkit with more cpu coures launch docker hyperkit with more cpu coures

It's bizzare to want to run Docker on a Mac anyway.










Launch docker hyperkit with more cpu coures